How China’s Balanced Growth is Affecting Africa


The  slowing  of  output  growth  in  major  emerging  economies  has  been  associated  with  lower commodity prices. Next to supply factors, the marked decline in investment and (rebalanced) growth in China is depressing commodity prices, particularly in metals and energy. Three key factors have underpinned Africa’s good economic performance since the turn of the century: high commodity prices, high external financial flows, and improved policies and institutions. Macroeconomic headwinds for Africa’s net commodity exporters may imply that Africa’s second pillar of past performance – external financial inflows – will suffer as well. While  lower  commodity  prices  are  providing  significant  headwinds  to  Africa’s  commodity exporters, the rebalancing of China may also provide backwinds, albeit gradually.

The relocation of low-end manufacturing from China might reinforce positive income effects of lower commodity prices in oil-importing countries. The backwinds can be expected to stimulate FDI inflows into Africa.  Benefits  from  reduced  fiscal  pressures  in  countries  with  high  fuel  shares  in  imports (Egypt,  Ethiopia,  Kenya,  Mozambique  and  Tanzania)  mirror  significant  challenges  for  energy exporters  (Angola,  Chad,  Congo,  Gabon  and  Nigeria)  and  other  commodity  exporters  (Ghana, South Africa and Zambia) arising from depressed commodity prices.

Lower commodity prices could shift Africa’s centre of economic gravity from west to east, towards less  commodity-dependent  economies.  Investment finance could follow, reinforced by the peripheral outreach of China’s One Belt One Road initiative (OBOR),  which  includes  East  Africa  for  infrastructure  finance.  China’s  new  Silk  Road  Fund  is targeting the economies along Africa’s east coast. This suggests a shift away from a traditional focus on securing natural resources towards a more exploratory focus on opportunities for a manufacturing hub in the African region. China’s slowdown could affect African development finance through several channels:

• Growth linkage: the slowdown lowers global growth in general and low-income country growth in particular, especially for commodity exporters.

• Trade: the slowdown translates into reduced African export earnings and lower corporate savings and trade credits. 

• Prices:  the  negative  income  effect  in  commodity-exporting  countries  of  lower  terms  of trade associated with lower metal and mineral prices reduces household, corporate and public savings. 

• Liquidity  supply:  lower  official  foreign-exchange  reserves  and  sovereign-wealth  fund assets may translate into lower credit supply to Africa.

China’s high growth has boosted global growth in recent years . From 2011 to 2015, China’s  relative  contribution  to  global  growth  was  on  a  par  with  advanced  countries,  despite stagnating  at  a  high  level  for  a  decade.  India’s  contribution  to  global  growth  has  also  risen since the early 2000s. However, China has contributed almost 30% to global growth in recent years,  approximately  20  percentage  points  more  than  India.  As  India  is  more  closed  and  still considerably poorer than China, it cannot yet offset the impact of China’s slowdown on global growth and trade. A recent World Bank study uses a general equilibrium model to quantify how lower and more  balanced  growth  in  China  might  affect  Africa’s  future  growth.  The  model simulated the effects of a slowdown, a rebalancing and the combined effect of both.

The  combined  effect  of  China’s  lower  growth  and  its  rebalancing  on  sub-Saharan  Africa  is positive,  as  the  positive  effect  from  the  more  balanced  growth  outweighs  the  negative  effect from lower growth. According to the simulation, by 2030, China’s transition will increase the level of GDP in sub-Saharan Africa by 4.7% relative to the baseline. Countries best placed to export consumer goods to China, including agricultural products, will benefit most from China’s lower but more balanced growth. According to this analysis, Zambia, a main copper exporter, is the only country that will not gain from China’s switch to a more consumption-based growth model.

However,  this  simulation  does  not  consider  possible  growth  effects  in  Africa  from  additional Chinese direct investment. To the extent that rising wages in China lead to higher unit labour cost, China’s external competitiveness in low-end manufactures will be eroded. China could thus expand its current presence in Africa’s special economic zones, or encourage the creation of new ones. Such positive growth effects from foreign direct investment (FDI) would increase as African countries reduce bottlenecks in infrastructure and energy supply. Trade linkages impact on financial flows via trade credits and indirectly via corporate profits.

China’s trade engagement with Africa has risen markedly since 2000. China has crowded out other trade partners in relative terms, except for India, which tripled in Africa’s export share . In absolute terms, the trade dynamic of emerging partners was crucial inquadrupling African exports from USD 142.4 billion in 2000 to USD 566.6 billion in 2014. As a bloc, the group of emerging partners now buys more African exports than advanced countries. Only 15 years earlier, their share represented one fifth of total African exports. In terms of trade dynamics and trade shares, China and India now account for a sizeable portion of Africa’s export earnings.

Trade  finance  is  a  potentially  strong  transmission  channel  between  the  financial  sector  and the real economy. Export credit and development loans from large emerging market economies (EMEs), notably Brazil, China and India, have occupied a relatively important role as vehicles for financing trade with Africa. As a result of shrinking surpluses in their current account and dwindling reserves, the size of export buyer credits, resource-backed credit lines and hybrid financing mechanisms extended to Africa by China and other EMEs risk being cut back.

The drop in commodity prices can undermine Africa’s resource mobilisation. The price channel, by which the EME slowdown impacts Africa’s financing, reinforces the effects of the trade channel. From the perspective of finance, the impact of changes in commodity prices is unlikely to be symmetric or a zero-sum game. The recycling of large surpluses in the current account of oil exporters  (including  African)  that  has  benefited  African  financing  will  not  be  paralleled  by corresponding surpluses of oil importers.

Tax revenues may also be negatively affected in a number of ways. Many countries in Africa rely on trade taxes (tariffs) to sustain government revenues, so collapsing commodity exports will  worsen  fiscal  positions.  Unlike  in  non-resource-rich  Africa,  resource  rents  accounted  for more than 80% of total tax collection in 2013 and 20% of GDP in oil-rich Algeria, Angola, Congo, Equatorial Guinea and Libya. Conversely, non-resource-rich countries broadened their tax base and raised tax collection through direct and indirect taxes. A generalised slump that affects consumption will lower tax revenues also in those countries.

Financial flows to Africa may be harmed by depleted EME reserves. The liquidity-supply channel has turned markedly since mid-2014. From a total of USD 1.8 trillion in 2000, global foreign exchange reserves reached a peak of USD 12 trillion in mid-2014. The fast accumulation of global economic imbalances over the 2000s brought about a significant shift in the world’s wealth in favour of EMEs running surpluses. China alone stockpiled reserves from USD 170 billion in 2000 to USD 4 trillion in August 2014, in order to contain appreciation pressures. Since mid-2014, both foreign exchange reserves and sovereign wealth fund (SWF) assets in emerging economies have dropped as a result of lower commodity prices and lower gross capital inflows. Net sales of foreign reserves by China, the Russian Federation and Saudi Arabia accounted for most of the drop. From their peak, these three countries alone have lowered foreign exchange reserves by USD 1.5 trillion. These countries have been prominent emerging investors in Africa in the past.


Adapted from African Economic Outlook 2016;  Sustainable Cities and Structural Transformation.

Please follow and like us:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *